The 2026 Cost-Per-Part Benchmark: CNC, SLS, MJF, L-PBF and Injection Moulding Compared
Three quotes land on your desk for the same bracket: one from a CNC shop, one from an SLS bureau, and one from a moulder. The headline prices vary wildly, but none reveal setup time, tooling amortisation, or lead-time cost. So what does “cheapest” actually mean when the most expensive variables are invisible? This guide is the first technology-agnostic cost-per-part benchmark for 2026: mapping CNC, additive manufacturing, and injection moulding against the same volume, geometry, and lead-time inputs, the way MakerVerse prices them from a single CAD upload. The Topic in a Nutshell Full-cost formula: Cost-per-part equals direct materials plus direct labour plus manufacturing overhead plus amortised tooling plus scrap, divided by good units shipped. Overhead weight: Manufacturing overhead typically accounts for 20–40% of total production cost, yet rarely appears as a separate line in supplier quotes. Volume tiers: 3D printing wins below roughly 50 to 100 parts, CNC machining

