7 Types Of Injection Moulding: Materials, Processes & Uses
Precision, speed, and versatility have made injection moulding the backbone of modern manufacturing, underpinning everything from medical devices to consumer electronics. Yet, the label “injection moulding” covers a fascinating spectrum of specialised processes, each designed to solve unique engineering challenges and to optimise for material choice, production speed, part geometry, or cost.
For engineers, procurement managers, and product developers, understanding the distinct types of injection moulding isn’t simply a technical curiosity; it’s the key to unlocking better performance, lower costs, and faster routes from concept to production.
Selecting the ideal moulding technique goes far beyond picking a standard process off the shelf. The right choice can reduce waste, ensure repeatable quality, and enable designs that would otherwise be unattainable. In this article, we’ll explore seven widely used types of injection moulding, breaking down how each works, which materials they suit best, their practical applications, and the benefits or trade-offs involved.
Whether you’re refining a prototype or ramping up to full-scale production, this guide will help you match your project’s needs to the most effective manufacturing solution, setting you up for success from the outset.
1. Conventional Injection Moulding
Conventional injection moulding serves as the workhorse of the plastics industry, forming the foundation from which all the specialised variants evolve. In its simplest form, this process melts thermoplastic pellets and forces the molten material into a cooled steel mould under high pressure.
Once the polymer solidifies, the part is ejected, and the cycle repeats, often thousands of times per day. This well-established technique strikes a balance between geometric flexibility, material choice, and unit cost, making it the go-to solution for numerous high-volume production runs.
1.1 Process Overview
At its core, the conventional injection moulding cycle comprises four main stages:
- Clamping: The mould halves are brought together under clamp pressure to resist injection forces.
- Injection: Thermoplastic granules are fed from the hopper into a heated barrel, where a reciprocating screw melts and conveys the melt toward the nozzle.
- Cooling: Molten plastic is injected into the mould cavity, then allowed to cool until it solidifies.
- Ejection: Once the part reaches a set temperature, ejector pins push it free, and the mould closes for the next shot.
The principal machine components include the feed hopper, heater-banded barrel, screw-driven injection unit and a hydraulic or electric clamping unit. The steel mould tool, often water-cooled, defines the part geometry. For a more detailed walkthrough of these stages, see Injection moulding.
1.2 Materials Commonly Used
Conventional injection moulding typically relies on general-purpose thermoplastics, chosen for their flow characteristics, strength and cost:
- Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS)
- Polypropylene (PP)
- Polycarbonate (PC)
- Nylon (PA)
- Polystyrene (PS)
- Thermoplastic Polyurethane (TPU)
Designers can achieve dimensional tolerances of around ±0.1 %, with minimum practical wall thicknesses down to approximately 0.1 mm, depending on material and mould design.
1.3 Typical Applications
Thanks to its repeatability and scalability, conventional injection moulding is ideal for:
- Automotive interior components (dashboards, trim panels)
- Electronic enclosures and consumer-electronics housings
- Household goods and packaging (caps, containers)
- Industrial fittings and connectors
When annual volumes exceed thousands to hundreds of thousands of parts, this process delivers the best per-unit economics.
1.4 Advantages and Limitations
Advantages
- Excellent repeatability once the mould is qualified
- Broad choice of polymers and colours
- Very low per-part cost in high-volume production
Limitations
- High initial tooling investment, often £5,000–£50,000+
- Design constraints on undercuts, thin ribs and steep side-walls
- Longer lead times for complex or multi-cavity moulds
Actionable tip: balance the upfront mould cost against the expected run-size. Projects with modest volumes may favour softer tooling or alternative processes.
1.5 MakerVerse Injection Moulding Service
For teams that need rapid turnaround without compromising quality, MakerVerse’s on-demand injection moulding serviceprovides instant AI-powered quotes, built-in DFM checks and access to an ISO-certified global manufacturing network. From prototyping through to high-volume production, you can upload your CAD model, compare material options and place an order—all on a single cloud platform.
2. Thin-Wall Injection Moulding
As product designers push for lighter, more cost-efficient parts, thin-wall injection moulding has emerged as the go-to solution for ultra-lightweight components. By reducing wall thicknesses to a fraction of conventional norms, this specialised process delivers faster cycles, lower material usage and slimmer geometries—all without sacrificing strength or dimensional control.
2.1 Definition and Key Characteristics
In thin-wall injection moulding, walls typically range between 0.5 mm and 2 mm in thickness. Such slender sections demand exceptionally fast melt flow and high injection pressures to fill the cavity before the polymer begins to solidify. Precision in mould design and stringent process control ensure uniform wall thickness and prevent warpage or burn-marks, while rapid filling rates (often 300 mm/s or higher) lock in tight tolerances.
2.2 Process and Equipment Requirements
Achieving reliable thin-wall parts hinges on specialised machinery and tooling. High-speed toggle presses or all-electric injection units—with rigid platens and low-compliance screws—are essential. These machines deliver swift injection strokes and exact shot control, while precision-engineered moulds feature polished gates, balanced runner systems and optimised cooling channels. For a deeper look at the mechanics behind this approach, see this thin-wall injection moulding overview.
2.3 Materials Suitable for Thin-Wall Moulding
Not every resin can cope with the demands of ultra-thin sections. Low-viscosity grades of polypropylene (PP), polystyrene (PS), acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), polycarbonate (PC) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) are the usual suspects. To maintain consistent melt flow, these materials often require thorough drying—reducing moisture to below 0.02 %—and careful control of melt-flow index (MFI) to match the injection speed.
2.4 Applications and Use Cases
Thin-wall parts are everywhere. In food packaging, yoghurt tubs and takeaway lids shrink cycle times from 10 s to under 5 s, boosting throughput. In consumer electronics, smartphone frames and tablet bezels demand sleek profiles without added bulk. In the medical sector, disposable labware—like pipette tips and sample trays—benefits from lightweight yet rigid walls. Each use case leverages the same principle: do more with less material, faster.
2.5 Benefits and Challenges
Benefits
- Material savings of up to 30 %, cutting resin costs and part weight
- Cycle-time reductions of 20 – 50 %, thanks to rapid fill and faster cooling
- Slim profiles that meet modern aesthetic and ergonomic requirements
Challenges
- Higher tooling costs and tighter maintenance tolerances
- Demanding process control to avoid flash, warpage or flow lines
- Requirement for specialist technicians and meticulous mould calibration
Despite the upfront investment, thin-wall injection moulding pays dividends in large-scale production, where material efficiency and fast cycles translate directly into reduced cost-per-part.
Start Your Manufacturing Project with MakerVerse
MakerVerse is a platform for sourcing industrial parts. It provides instant access to a vetted supply chain and a full range of manufacturing technologies. With AI-powered quoting, order management, and fulfilment, MakerVerse helps with everything from initial prototypes to full-scale production.
3. Gas-Assisted Injection Moulding
Gas-assisted injection moulding is a specialised process designed to produce parts with hollow or thick-walled sections while minimising sink marks and internal stresses. By introducing pressurised gas into the melt, this technique creates internal channels that reduce material usage and shorten cooling times. It’s particularly well suited to large, ergonomically shaped components where weight reduction and surface quality are paramount.
3.1 How the Gas-Assisted Process Works
In gas-assisted injection moulding, the cycle begins much like conventional moulding: molten plastic is injected to partially fill the cavity. At a predetermined shot volume—often 50–70% fill—the mould is paused and a precisely timed pulse of nitrogen (N₂) is injected through dedicated gas pins or a runner system. The gas pressure forces the melt outward against the cavity walls, forming hollow sections along the part’s interior.
Once the gas has created the desired channels, the melt cools against the mould surface, solidifying into a dense “skin” while the core remains hollow. A “pinch-off” or seal is formed at the gas entry point to trap the gas inside, and any residual gas is vented back through the runner. The result is a component with a uniform wall appearance, minimal sink marks and significantly reduced mass.
3.2 Material and Design Considerations
Not every polymer can tolerate gas-assist. Commonly used resins include:
- ABS (Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene)
- PC (Polycarbonate)
- HIPS (High Impact Polystyrene)
- POM (Polyoxymethylene)
- PA (Nylon)
- PP (Polypropylene)
Designing for gas-assist demands consistent wall thickness—typically 2–8 mm—to guide the gas along straight, uninterrupted runs. Sharp corners, drastic section changes or deep ribs can impede gas flow and cause uneven channeling. Mould tools must incorporate robust venting and dedicated gas pins positioned strategically to ensure the gas front advances smoothly.
3.3 Applications and Examples
This process shines in applications where hollow interiors and smooth exteriors are desirable:
- Hollow Handles: Ergonomic tool grips or power-tool housings that feel sturdy but weigh less.
- Furniture Legs: Lightweight structural members for chairs or tables.
- Large Panels: Wall-mounted enclosures or decorative panels in appliances.
- Automotive Components: Shells for armrests or headrests with embedded gas channels to cut weight without compromising strength.
For instance, an automotive armrest shell moulded with gas assistance can shed up to 25% of its bulk material, reducing both cost and part weight while maintaining a blemish-free finish.
3.4 Advantages and Limitations
Advantages of gas-assisted injection moulding include:
- Material savings of 15–30%, thanks to hollow cores
- Shorter cycle times, as thinner skins cool faster
- Reduced sink marks and warpage in thick sections
- Lower clamp force requirements compared to filling a solid part
However, there are trade-offs:
- Gas channels complicate mould design, making multi-cavity tools challenging
- Clear or transparent plastics may suffer surface fogging where gas interfaces with the melt
- Initial setup and process optimisation require experienced mouldmakers and technicians
By weighing these factors—material compatibility, part geometry and production volume—designers can determine whether gas-assisted injection moulding will deliver the optimal balance of cost, quality and performance.
4. Multi-Material Injection Moulding
Multi-material injection moulding (MMM) elevates conventional processes by integrating two or more polymers—often with very different characteristics—into a single component in one production cycle. Instead of assembling parts post-moulding, MMM builds complex assemblies in situ, combining rigid substrates with elastomeric overmoulds or embedding functional inserts with cosmetic finishes. This approach can reduce part count, streamline assembly and deliver localised variation in material performance exactly where it’s needed.
4.1 Overview of MMM Techniques
Multi-material injection moulding encompasses several distinct methods:
- Multi-component moulding: Sequential injection of different melts via independent injection units.
- Multi-shot moulding: The mould indexes between shots, allowing materials to form distinct layers or sections.
- Overmoulding: A second material—typically a softer elastomer—is injected over a pre-formed plastic core or insert.
Each technique demands specific tooling and cycle strategies, yet all share the objective of producing fully integrated parts without secondary assembly. For a deeper explanation, see Multi-material injection moulding on Wikipedia.
4.2 Common Material Combinations
Designers choose polymer pairings to exploit contrasting properties:
- Rigid + soft: ABS or PC cores with TPE or TPU overmoulds for comfortable grips and seals.
- Blends: PC/ABS alloys for balanced impact resistance and thermal performance.
- Hard plastic + rubber: Functional zones—such as anti-slip handles or soft-touch buttons—moulded directly onto a sturdy base.
Successful bonding often relies on chemical compatibility or dedicated adhesion promoters. It’s also crucial to accommodate differences in shrinkage and thermal expansion to prevent delamination.
4.3 Applications and Use Cases
Multi-material parts are prevalent across industries:
- Toothbrush handles combining rigid polypropylene with a soft TPE grip in one cycle.
- Ergonomic power-tool handles featuring a nylon core and rubberised overmould for vibration damping.
- Medical instruments with sterile, soft-touch finger pads over a rigid housing.
- Decorative or functional inserts, such as two-colour logos or transparent windows, moulded without post-assembly.
This seamless integration of form and function enhances both product aesthetics and user experience.
4.4 Benefits and Constraints
Benefits of multi-material injection moulding include:
- Assembly elimination: No adhesives, welds or manual fitting steps.
- Localised material properties: Stiffness, flexibility or grip exactly where required.
- Design freedom: Overmoulded seals, multi-colour elements and payload inserts in a single tool.
Constraints to consider:
- Complex mould design: Precise alignment, multi-stage gating and shot sequencing are essential.
- Higher tooling cost: Additional injection units, rotating platens or slides increase investment.
- Extended cycle times: Each extra shot lengthens the overall moulding cycle, affecting throughput.
By balancing material ambitions, projected volumes and budget, you can determine whether multi-material injection moulding is the ideal solution for your next project.
5. Micro Injection Moulding
When component dimensions shrink to the millimetre and sub-millimetre scale, standard injection moulding gives way to micro injection moulding. This highly specialised process produces parts weighing as little as 0.1 g, with feature sizes down to a few tens of micrometres. It’s critical in applications where precision and miniaturisation are non-negotiable, from medical implants to watchmaking and micro-fluidic devices.
5.1 Defining Micro Moulding
Micro moulding refers to any injection process that handles shot weights typically between 0.1 g and 1 g and cavity features measured in micrometres. Components can be smaller than a pea yet require tight dimensional tolerances—often ±0.01 mm or better. For a thorough overview, see Micro injection moulding on Wikipedia.
5.2 Equipment and Process Adaptations
Producing micro parts demands tailored machinery and tooling. Micro-injection presses employ tiny screws—commonly 8–15 mm in diameter—to meter and inject precise melt volumes. Moulds are manufactured to sub-micron surface finishes, with mould cavities only a few millimetres across. Process controls must regulate injection speed, melt temperature and back-pressure with exceptional accuracy. Even small fluctuations in barrel temperature or screw position can lead to flash, short shots or dimensional drift.
5.3 Materials for Micro Parts
Not all polymers adapt well to ultra-small geometries. Low-viscosity grades of polyoxymethylene (POM), polycarbonate (PC) and polypropylene (PP) are favourites for their good flow and minimal shrinkage. In certain micro-seal or micro-valve applications, liquid silicones offer the flexibility and biocompatibility required at tiny scales. Material selection often hinges on balancing flowability, mechanical performance and the end-use environment.
5.4 Example Applications
Micro injection moulding underpins several high-precision industries:
- Medical Devices: Micro-valves, micro-tubing connectors and implantable components that must meet sterilisation standards.
- Timepieces: Micro-gears and escapement parts in luxury watches, where surface finish and tolerance are paramount.
- Micro-Optics: Lens arrays and micro-prisms for sensors or lab-on-a-chip devices, requiring optical clarity and precise geometry.
- Micro-Electronics: Housings and connectors for MEMS sensors and miniature actuators.
5.5 Advantages and Challenges
Micro injection moulding offers unrivalled repeatability and precision, enabling features that no other mass-production process can match. However, these benefits come with trade-offs:
- High Capital Cost: Equipment and mould tooling command a premium, often several times the cost of conventional systems.
- Stringent Environment: Temperature, humidity and vibration must be tightly controlled to avoid defects.
- Complex Maintenance: Tiny feed ports and fine tolerances require meticulous upkeep and specialised technician skill.
Despite these hurdles, micro moulding remains the go-to for any project where miniaturisation and high throughput converge—delivering consistent quality part after part.
6. Liquid Silicone Injection Moulding
Liquid Silicone Injection Moulding (LIM) stands apart from thermoplastic processes by using liquid silicone rubber (LSR), a two-component elastomer that cures inside the mould. Rather than melting a polymer granule, LIM mixes cold silicone components, injects them into a heated cavity and triggers vulcanisation in situ. This specialised approach delivers high-precision rubber parts with excellent consistency—ideal for applications demanding tight tolerances, biocompatibility or extreme resistance to heat and chemicals.
6.1 What Is Liquid Silicone Injection Moulding (LIM)?
In LIM, two liquid silicone cartridges—often denoted A and B—are metered and mixed under pressure before entering the mould. The tool is held at temperatures between 150 °C and 200 °C, where the silicone undergoes peroxidic or platinum-catalysed vulcanisation. Unlike thermoplastics, LSR never truly “melts” and there is no cooling phase in the classical sense: the part solidifies as the silicone cross-links within the hot mould cavity. Once cured, the elastomer retains its shape and properties without further annealing.
6.2 Properties of Silicone Elastomers
Silicone elastomers offer a combination of attributes unmatched by most plastics:
- Biocompatibility and food-grade approval for medical or kitchenware applications
- Broad temperature range (−60 °C to +230 °C) with minimal change in mechanical performance
- Excellent chemical resistance to oils, solvents and UV exposure
- Low compression set and high elasticity for durable seals and gaskets
- Electrical insulation properties for electronic over-moulds
These intrinsic properties explain why engineers often specify LSR where standard thermoplastics fail to meet demanding service conditions.
6.3 Typical Applications
LIM parts feature across diverse industries:
- Medical Devices: Catheter tips, implantable seals and ventilator masks where sterilisable, biocompatible components are essential.
- Consumer Goods: Kitchen utensils, child-safe bottle nipples and wearable products that require food-safe, flexible materials.
- Electronics: Keypads, gaskets and cable-overmoulds that benefit from silicone’s dielectric strength and tactile softness.
- Automotive Seals: Door gaskets, engine bay connectors and vibration dampers exposed to heat, oils and ozone.
By producing net-shape parts with integrated features, LIM reduces assembly steps and enhances product reliability.
6.4 Equipment and Process Requirements
Executing a reliable LIM cycle depends on precision equipment and tooling:
- Metering/Mixing Heads: Twin-plunger or static-mixer systems ensure exact A:B ratios and homogeneous mixing.
- Heated Moulds: Thermally controlled cavities maintain uniform temperatures to guarantee consistent cure times across all cavities.
- High-Pressure Injection Units: Pumps or syringes designed for low-viscosity fluids deliver shot weights from a few grams up to several hundred grams without shear degradation.
- Sealed Tooling and Venting: Tight parting lines prevent flash, while micro-vents allow trapped air to escape without LSR leakage.
Strict process controls on temperature, pressure and shot timing are crucial—any deviation can lead to under-cured spots or excessive flash.
6.5 Pros and Cons
Pros
- Near-net-shape accuracy, eliminating secondary machining or finishing
- Permanent elastomeric properties with excellent physical and chemical resistance
- Fully automated mixing and injection for high repeatability
- Biocompatibility and regulatory approvals for medical and food applications
Cons
- Irreversible cure prevents regrinding or recycling of scrap silicone
- Higher tooling and start-up costs compared to thermoplastic moulds
- Need for specialised injection units and precise viscosity management
- Limited raw-material shelf life once cartridges are opened
By weighing these factors, designers can determine whether the performance advantages of LIM justify its upfront investment and process complexity.
7. Structural Foam Moulding
Structural foam moulding—or moulded structural foam—is a specialised injection process that introduces a blowing agent or inert gas into the polymer melt, producing a part with a low-density, foamed core and a solid outer skin. This skin–core structure grants the part exceptional stiffness-to-weight ratios, making it ideal for large components where weight reduction, material savings and structural rigidity are paramount. By combining form, function and economy, structural foam moulding enables the production of sizeable, lightweight parts that would be costly or difficult to achieve through conventional solid moulding techniques.
7.1 Process Fundamentals
In a typical structural foam cycle, the polymer resin and a chemical blowing agent—or an inert gas such as nitrogen—are either mixed directly in the injection barrel or introduced into the mould cavity after shot injection. As the melt enters the cooled cavity, the temperature drop triggers the blowing agent to decompose or the gas to expand, creating microscopic bubbles throughout the core. The outer surface against the steel tool collapses under pressure, forming a dense “skin,” while the interior remains foamed. This dual-phase structure cools faster than a fully solid part, and the reduced material density helps to minimise sink marks and internal stresses.
7.2 Materials and Blowing Agents
Common resins for structural foam moulding include polyurethane, acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), polycarbonate, polyphenylene oxide (Noryl) and polybutylene terephthalate. Chemical blowing agents—often azodicarbonamide or sodium bicarbonate compounds—decompose at predefined temperatures to release gases that expand the melt. Alternatively, nitrogen gas can be injected under controlled pressure. Selection of resin and blowing agent must account for melt viscosity, compatibility with foaming chemistry and desired mechanical properties of the finished part.
7.3 Applications
Structural foam moulding excels in producing large, hollow or semi-hollow parts that require good strength without excessive weight. Typical applications include:
- Automotive roof and door panels, offering rigidity with reduced mass
- Housings and enclosures for medical devices and laboratory equipment
- Cabinet doors, large consumer electronics casings and furniture components
- Sporting goods such as kayak hulls or sled frames
Across these applications, structural foam parts deliver high stiffness while conserving material and energy.
7.4 Advantages and Disadvantages
Advantages:
- Significant weight savings and material reduction, lowering part cost
- High stiffness-to-weight ratio—up to eight times stiffer than comparable solid polymers
- Capability to mould large parts in single pieces, reducing assembly steps
- Resistance to warpage and lower incidence of sink marks due to uniform foaming
Disadvantages:
- Coarser surface finish that may require additional post-processing for aesthetic applications
- Minimum wall thickness typically above 0.25 in (≈6.35 mm), limiting very thin part designs
- Longer cycle times compared to conventional moulding, as foaming and cooling stages require careful control
- Potential for slight dimensional variability inherent in foamed cores
7.5 Design Guidelines
Effective structural foam designs balance flow symmetry and wall thickness to ensure even foaming and cooling. Recommended wall thicknesses start at 0.25 in (≈6.35 mm) or greater, with gradual transitions between sections to avoid stress concentrations. Moulds should incorporate generous radii, venting channels to release excess gas and robust draft angles for reliable part ejection. Balanced runner systems and gated entry points help maintain consistent skin thickness around the cavity. By adhering to these guidelines, designers can harness structural foam moulding to deliver large, lightweight components with outstanding structural performance.
Stay on Schedule with MakerVerse
Unreliable lead times can disrupt your entire project. MakerVerse provides consistent delivery windows, real-time order tracking, and a dependable supply chain. From prototype to production, you stay in control and on time.
Metal Injection Moulding (MIM): Expanding the Boundaries of Injection Moulding
As a final evolution of the injection moulding family, Metal Injection Moulding (MIM) pushes the boundaries of what’s possible with this versatile manufacturing method. Instead of thermoplastics or silicones, MIM uses fine metal powders blended with thermoplastic binders to form intricate, high-performance metal components—parts that would be too costly or geometrically complex to produce via traditional machining or casting.
The process mirrors conventional moulding at first: the metal–binder mix is pelletised, melted, and injected into steel tooling. After moulding, parts go through debinding and high-temperature sintering, fusing the metal into a dense, net-shape component. Alloys like stainless steel, titanium, and Inconel® are common, enabling MIM to serve critical applications in aerospace, automotive, medical devices, and precision instruments.
MIM’s true advantage lies in combining material performance with complex geometries—achieving features like threads, undercuts, and tight tolerances in a single operation. And while tooling costs are significant and post-processing often required, the efficiency gains in high-volume production and design freedom make it a powerful option for engineering teams aiming to reduce part count, minimise waste, and elevate product performance.
Matching Process to Purpose
From thin-walled packaging to micro-sized implants, the world of injection moulding is far more nuanced than a single method. Each variant—whether it’s gas-assisted, multi-material, or metal-based—addresses specific design challenges and unlocks new possibilities across industries.
Understanding these processes isn’t just about technical curiosity. It’s about equipping yourself to make smarter sourcing decisions, lower risk in development, and produce parts that meet performance, cost, and time-to-market goals.
Ready to put this knowledge into action? Upload your file to MakerVerse and get an instant quote across multiple injection moulding technologies, complete with DFM feedback and supplier matching. The proper process is out there. Let’s help you find it.